Lawyer Who Used ChatGPT in Brief Explains Fake Cases to Judge

In a recent court hearing, a lawyer named Steven Schwartz admitted to using the free artificial intelligence tool ChatGPT to create fake case citations and court opinions. Schwartz, who is facing punishment for his actions, claimed that he had no idea the tool could be used in this way.

During the hearing, US District Judge P. Kevin Castel asked Schwartz about his use of ChatGPT. Schwartz explained that he had used the tool to generate legal arguments and citations for a brief he was working on. However, he admitted that he had not realized the tool could create fake cases and opinions.

Schwartz went on to say that he regretted his actions and that he had “failed miserably” in his duties as a lawyer. He asked the judge for leniency, stating that he had never intended to deceive the court or his clients.

The use of artificial intelligence tools in the legal profession is a growing trend, with many lawyers and law firms using these tools to streamline their work and improve their efficiency. However, the case of Steven Schwartz highlights the potential risks and ethical concerns associated with these tools.

As journalists, it is our responsibility to report on stories like this and to hold those in power accountable for their actions. We must also be diligent in our research and fact-checking, using a variety of techniques to verify information and uncover sources. Above all, we must adhere to journalistic ethics and deliver accurate reporting using our own distinct style.